50 Years of NASASCAM
Numerous Anomalies and Scams Abound

This web page is dedicated to NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine, NASA Historian Erik Conway, and the few remaining Apollo astronauts, who make themselves a worldwide laughing stock with their claim of landing on the Moon.
If the Internet, and e-mail were around in 1968, I would have been glad to have a serious open debate with "Apollo believers" on whether the Moon missions were for real or not. However, it is not 1968, but 2020 and, as such, the authenticity of the Apollo Moon missions can no longer be debated. Neither does it fall into a "conspiracy theory" as the facts are well known. Conspiracy theories question what really took place, however it has been a well proven fact since the mid 80's, that the Apollo Moon missions were faked by NASA for propaganda purpose.
Although it's common knowledge throughout the world that the Apollo Moon missions were faked by NASA back in the 60's, many gullible people still accept NASA's claim of sending men to the Moon, without bothering to carry out any research, or investigation, to see if NASA are indeed telling the truth. There are those who will never accept the Moon missions were faked, regardless of how much factual evidence of a fake is put before them, I refer to those people as PAN's which stands for Pro Apollo Nutters.
Those who will not accept that Apollo was a fake, have been brain washed into believing over 50 years of lies from NASA such that they become brain damaged, and lose touch with reality. We've all come across them from time to time as they re-iterate their ridiculous statements like, "I can see the flag through my telescope", or "I saw the rocket lift off, and the TV pictures, so it must have happened". They also make stupid remarks like "What about the Moon rock brought back by the Apollo astronauts?". How do we know its Moon rock?  It's only NASA's word, and if it is, then it was brought back by scoop and return probe.
If you are one who likes living in a fantasy world, there is no hope. However if you are one of those who has serious doubt about the Apollo Moon landings ever happening, then this site is for you.
The comical aspect about NASA's 50 year Moon hoax, (Apollo 8), is how it's making a worldwide laughing stock of NASA, and the astronauts who claim to have traveled to the Moon. The most damning aspect however, is that NASA's Moon landing scam is confusing the younger generation, by giving them a disorientated view of current space travel and technology. For example, many youngsters who saw the shuttle lift off from launch pad assumed it was going to the Moon. They could not understand why it was only going 200 miles into low Earth orbit, when NASA supposedly made 9 manned journeys to the Moon, (each mission being a return trip of over 500,000 miles), during a 3 year period which began over 50 years ago. Yes NASA made trips to the Moon look like a 10 minute bus ride to the local shops, and most, but not all, people fell for it hook, line and sinker.
If NASA did send men to the Moon, then space technology has gone backwards instead of forward. That seems somewhat bizarre when one looks at technology advances, particularly in computer science. Of course space technology has not gone backwards. What is bizarre is NASA's outlandish claim.
Since 1995, more and more encyclopedias, are making less and less, and in some cases no reference at all, to the Apollo Moon missions. Evidently the publishers have "wised up" to the fact that the Apollo missions were faked, and no man has been to the Moon and back. "A hole in history", as Arthur C. Clarke quoted back in 1969.
At the time NASA faked the Moon missions, they anticipated that there would be people around the globe who would dispute them, (the author of this site was one). However they surmised that it would never spread any further than a few people discussing it in their local pub, or at work. How wrong they were. NASA never envisaged that 30 years later every person in the world would be able to talk, discuss, then share information and thoughts with one another in a matter of seconds.
During the 1970's, a large percentage of people had serious doubt that the Moon landing ever happened. However there was no material available upon which to base an investigation, other than a limited number of photographs shown in a few ficitional, fantasy books which endorsed Apollo. Neither could they share their thoughts with others in the world who held the same belief.
In 1995 the Internet brought about the downfall and full expose of NASA's 25 year hoax, as people worldwide now had full access to NASA's web site pictures, and could see for themselves the pathetic way in which the photographs had been doctored with the same repetitive background. Prior to 1995 it was not possible to see these pictures, but you can now study them in the comfort of your own home.
Sites exposing the Moon landings as fake, will soon outnumber the untrue Apollo Moon web sites. Click on each picture to go to the same picture on a NASA site, and click on links at bottom of page for the full, complete story on the biggest scam ever hoisted upon the world's media.
The so called lunar map used for Apollo 17 mission, the quality of which is very poor, however scale is marked in Kms. Now perhaps some of you Pro Apollo Nutters out there could tell me why this map is marked in Kms, when in the USA the Imperial system of measurement is used?

Even today measurements are logged in miles, so they were most certainly using miles back in 1968. Note the alleged landing site marked X and journeys made in varying directions to the Stations numbered 1 to 10B.

Note Station 8 and distance it is from LM landing site.
The Moon's surface was, as we were told, very dry and dusty. If that were the case then why do footprints show up so boldly? The only surface that would leave footprints showing that boldly would be damp sand, or soft earth/ash, and that's probably what it is.

Note curved light marking in top left hand corner, and black crater between the rock and that contraption. There is no evident sign of the LM in this picture.
Photograph shown left is stated as being Station 6 on the Moon. Notice how the background is identical with that same curved light marking, and crater.

The foreground in this picture was actually taken at a remote location in Arizona, so the shadows one sees are natural occurring shadows from sunlight here on planet Earth. It is but a simple matter to black the sky out, and paste in the background mountain scene.

NASA tell us that this astronaut on rover, is at Station 9.

However that same curved light marking, and crater are there in background, and again picture was taken from exactly the same angle.
Picture shown left is Station 8, Cochise crater. Is it not somewhat strange that this picture also shows same background, scene, and yet again picture was taken from the same angle.

Text accompanying this picture states "The final parking place of the rover prior to lift off". Looking at EVA map, Station 8 is the furthest point North from the LM landing site. Did they walk the 5 Kms back to LM?
Picture, shown right, is Camelot crater which is Station 5. Camelot crater is over 1 kilometer from the landing site in a totally opposite direction to Station 8, (which incidentally is over 6 Kms from Station 5). Low and behold that same curvature of light, but crater has been obliterated in this shot.

A classic example of shuffling the background imagery to try and create differing views. Tuttle did a poor job of blackening the sky in this picture. Look closely on a high res screen, and you will see evidence of trees within the blackness of space.

NASA claim that picture on left is Station 7.

However it is plain to see that background has again the same identical curved light marking.

The angle, and orientation that picture was taken, are also the same.

This final picture, taken from ALSJ web site, is portrayed as being the Apollo 17 landing site.

One does not need to be a photographic expert to notice that, like all the others, it has the same identical background, and yet the LM does not appear in the photographs above.

Note that the picture has no reticules, yet it was supposedly taken by the same camera that took all other shots. How many differrent camera's did they take with them to the Moon?
If this picture was taken in 1972, why did it not appear in any books or magazines until 1994, when it first appeared in a newspaper, and why is it in color on the ALSJ site, when other pics are in monochrome, especially as they were again taken by the same camera?
Still not convinced? Then maybe this final photograph will prove my theory. It shows John Dorsey at Langley Research Center where they are currently designing a crane to unload cargo for, as Mr Dorsey quotes, "When astronauts return to the Moon".

I think they would do better spending their time figuring out how to get to the Moon for the first time instead of fabricating any so called evidence they've been. Notice in background canvas backdrop used in faking the Apollo 17 photographs.
In 1994 I contacted NASA for an explanation as to why the Apollo 17 Moon photographs all had the same background, when taken at differing locations. I'm still waiting for an answer. I also contacted the News of World at the same time to expose the dodgy Moon pictures. However back then they assumed you were some kind of idiot to suggest the Moon landings were fake. Time, however, has proven that this so-called idiot, was in fact correct.
If the astronauts covered an area roughly 8 Kms by 12 Kms, and panned their camera through 360 degrees at the various locations, what are the odds against getting an identical background in each picture? Six separate locations which are miles apart, and yet each one has the same identical background. In all pictures one can see a relatively flat foreground, and an abrupt straight line where foreground meets the background hilly area. This is conclusive proof that background hilly scene has been pasted onto photo, and the sky blacked out.
The evidence of false backdrops is not so noticeable in the earlier faked pictures for missions 11/12 and 14, as they were taken at Langley Research Center in the 'MOONSET' studio. It is the latter missions, ie, 15/16 and 17 where anomalies are plainly obvious. When questioned about the authenticity of the Moon landings, NASA's reply is "We do not have time to answer any questions, the truth is in the photographs". The truth is indeed within the photographs, and the truth hurts. These photographs are fake, which means the Moon landings are also fake.

NASASCAM Fake Moon Landing

Clavius Moon hoax debunking

Aulis Moon hoax

Moonfaker Moon hoax

Moonmovie Moon hoax
Fake Moon Landing
How, and where, NASA faked the lunar orbiting, landing, and lift off videos.
Read what the media say about naughty NASA.
USGS involvement in the faking of Apollo Moon missions.
The person responsible for NASA's fake Moon pictures.
The truth, and reason, why NASA faked the Apollo Moon missions.
Misleading data regarding the Apollo missions.
How space radiation makes Moon trip impossible.
Facts to be considered about Apollo, plus a Q and A section.
More of NASA's fake Moon pictures, with added humour.
You've just gotta take the mickey.
Clear cut evidence of fakery in the Apollo Moon videos.
NASASCAM:  Living in the REAL world, not a FANTASY one.