Numerous Anomalies and Scams
This web page
is dedicated to NASA Chief Charles F. Bolden, NASA Historian William Barry, and
the few remaining Apollo astronauts, who make themselves a worldwide laughing
stock with their ongoing claim of having walked upon the Moon's
Internet and e-mail were around in 1968, I would have been glad to have a
serious open debate with "Apollo believers" on whether the Moon missions were
for real or not. However it is not 1968, but 2017 and, as such, the authenticity
of the Moon missions can no longer be debated. Neither does it fall into a
"conspiracy theory" as the facts are well known. Conspiracy theories question
what really took place, however it has been a well proven fact since the mid
80's, that the Apollo Moon missions were faked.
common knowledge throughout the world that the Apollo Moon missions were faked
by NASA back in the 60's, many gullible people still accept NASA's claim of
sending men to the Moon, without bothering to carry out any research, or
investigation, to see if NASA are indeed telling the truth. There are some who
will never accept the Moon missions were faked, regardless
of how much factual evidence of a fake is put before them, I refer to those
people as PAN's which stands for Pro Apollo Nutters.
will not accept that Apollo was a fake, have been brain washed into believing 48
years of lies from NASA, they then become brain damaged, and lose touch with
reality. We've all come across them from time to time as they reiterate their
ridiculous statements like, "I can see the flag through my telescope", or "I saw
the rocket lift off, and the TV pictures, so it must have happened". They also
make stupid remarks like "What about the Moon rock brought back by the Apollo
astronauts". How do we know its Moon rock, its only NASA's
word, and if it is, then it was brought back by scoop and return probe, not
If you are
one who lives in a fantasy world, there is no hope, however if you are one of
those who has serious doubt about the Apollo Moon landings ever happening, then
this site is for you.
aspect about NASA's 48 year Moon hoax, (Apollo 8), is how it's making a
worldwide laughing stock of NASA, and the astronauts who claim to have traveled
to the Moon. The most damning aspect however, is that NASA's Moon landing scam
is confusing the younger generation, by giving them a disorientated view of
current space travel and technology. For example, many youngsters who saw the
shuttle lift off from launch pad assumed it was going to the Moon. They could
not understand why it was only going 150 miles into low Earth orbit, when NASA
supposedly made 9 manned journeys to the Moon, (each mission being a return trip
of over 500,000 miles), during a 3 year period which began over 48 years ago.
Yes NASA made trips to the Moon look like a 10 minute bus ride to the local
shops, and most, but not all, people fell for it hook, line and sinker.
If NASA did
send men to the Moon, then space technology has gone backwards instead of
forward. That seems somewhat bizarre when one looks at technology advances,
particularly in computer science. Of course space technology has
not gone backwards. What is bizarre is NASA's outlandish
more and more encyclopedias are making less and less, and in some cases no
reference at all, to the Apollo Moon missions. Evidently the publishers have
"wised up" to the fact that the Apollo missions were faked, and no man has been
to the Moon and back. "A hole in history", as Arthur C. Clarke quoted back in
At the time
NASA faked the Moon missions, they anticipated that there would be people around
the globe who would dispute them, (the author of this site was one), however
they surmised that it would never spread any further than a few people
discussing it in their local pub, or at work. How wrong they were. NASA never
envisaged that 30 years later every person on the planet would be able to talk,
discuss, then share information and thoughts with one another in a matter of
70's, a large percentage of those people had serious doubt that the Moon
landings were for real, however there was no material available upon which to
base an investigation, other than the limited number of photographs shown in a
few fictional/fantasy books which endorsed Apollo. They also could not share
their thoughts with others around the globe who held the same belief.
In 1995 the
Internet brought about the downfall and full expose of NASA's 27 year hoax, as
people worldwide now had full access to NASA's web site pictures, and could see
for themselves the pathetic way in which the photographs had been doctored with
the same repetitive background. Prior to 1995 it was not
possible to see these pictures, but you can now study them in the comfort of
your own home.
exposing the Moon landings as fake, will soon outnumber the untrue Apollo Moon
web sites. Click on each picture to go to the same picture on a NASA site, and
click on links at bottom of page for the full, complete story on the biggest
scam ever hoisted upon the world's media.
The so called
lunar map used for Apollo 17 mission, the quality of which is very poor, however
scale is marked in Kms. Now perhaps some of you Pro Apollo Nutters out there
could tell me WHY this map is marked in Kms, when in the USA the Imperial system
of measurement is always used? Even today measurements are
logged in miles, so they were most certainly using miles back in 1968. Note the
alleged landing site marked X and journeys made in varying directions to the so
called Stations which are numbered 1 to 10B. Note Station 8 and distance it is
from LM landing site.
surface was, as we were told, very dry and dusty, if that were the case then why
do those footprints show up so boldly. The only surface that would leave
footprints showing that boldly would be damp sand/earth, and that's probably
what it is. Note curved light marking in top left hand corner, and black crater
between the rock and that contraption. There is no evident sign of the LM in
shown left is supposedly Station 6 on the Moon.Notice how the background is
identical with the same curved light marking, and crater.
The foreground in this picture was actually taken at a remote location in
Arizona, so the shadows one sees are natural occurring shadows from sunlight
here on planet Earth. It is but a simple matter to black the sky out, and paste
in a background mountain scene.
astronaut on rover, is supposed to be Station 9, but that
same curved light marking, and crater are there in
background, and again picture was taken from exactly the
Station 8, Cochise crater. It's funny innit the picture again shows
same background, and yet again picture was taken from the
same angle. Text accompanying this picture states "The
final parking place of the rover prior to lift off". Looking at EVA map, Station
8 is the furthest point North from the LM landing site. Did they walk the 5 Kms
back to LM?
shown right, is Camelot crater which is Station 5. Camelot crater is over 1
kilometer from the landing site in a totally opposite
direction to Station 8, (which incidentally is over 6 Kms from Station 5). Low
and behold that same curvature of light, but the crater has
been obliterated in this shot. A classic example of shuffling the background
imagery to try and create differing views. Tuttle did a poor job of blackening
the sky in this picture. Look closely on a high res screen, and you will see
evidence of trees within the blackness of space.
that picture on left is Station 7, however it is plain to see that background is
again identical, with that same curved light marking, and
the angle/orientation that picture was taken is also the
picture, taken from ALSJ web site, is portrayed as the Apollo 17 landing site.
One does not need to be a photographic expert to spot that photo, like all the
others, has the same identical background, and yet the LM
does not appear in the photos above. The background scene, (canvas backdrop
retained at LRC), has been superimposed, (pasted), onto pictures which
NASA claim are genuine Moon photo's taken at different
reticules on the above photo, and yet it was taken by the
same camera as all other Moon photos. If this picture was
taken in 1972, why did it not appear in any books or magazines until 1994, when
it first appeared in a newspaper, and why is it in color on the ALSJ site, when
other pics are monochrome, especially as they were again taken by the
astronauts covered an area roughly 8 Kms by 12 Kms, and panned their camera
through 360 degrees at various locations, what are the odds against getting an
identical background in each picture? Six separate locations which are miles
apart, and yet each has the same identical background. In
all the pictures one can see a relatively flat foreground, and an abrupt
straight line where that foreground meets the background hilly area. This is
conclusive proof that background hilly scene has been
pasted onto photo, and the sky blacked out. If you look at
picture on APOLLO REALITY 2 site, you
will see that same flat foreground, and abrupt straight line where sandy
foreground meets bushy area at the rear.
of false backdrops is not so noticeable in the earlier faked pictures for
missions 11/12 and 14, as they were taken at Langley Research Center in the
'MOONSET' studio. It is the latter missions, ie, 15/16 and 17 where anomalies
are plainly obvious. When questioned about the authenticity of the Moon
landings, NASA's reply is "We do not have time to answer any questions, the
truth is in the photographs". The truth is indeed within the photographs, and
the truth hurts. These photographs are fake, which means
the Moon landings are also fake.
convinced? Then maybe this recent photograph will prove my theory. It shows John
Dorsey at Langley Research Center where they are currently designing a crane to
unload cargo for, as Mr Dorsey quotes, "When astronauts return to the Moon". I
think they would do better spending their time figuring out how to get to the
Moon for the first time instead of fabricating the evidence, and forget about
building cranes for use on the Moon.
Notice in the
background the canvas backdrop used in faking the Apollo 17
person responsible for NASA's fake Apollo Moon pictures.
where NASA faked the lunar orbiting/landing, and lift off
from the Apollo missions which does not add up.
reason NASA faked the Apollo Moon missions.
ridiculous Moon pics with added humor.
How deadly space radiation makes Moon trip impossible.
to be considered about Apollo Moon missions.
All sites best viewed at 1024 x 768,
or 1024 x 600 resolution with medium text size.
Living in the REAL world, not a FANTASY